NEW STOCK! 60-2 Tooth 9 Bolt 225mm EFI DME Conversion Sport Flywheel For 915 / 901 / 911 Transaxles (FLW 225 9EFI DME602 PMS / FLW 225 36DME LW PMS)

NEW STOCK! 60-2 Tooth 9 Bolt 225mm EFI DME Conversion Sport Flywheel For 915 / 901 / 911 Transaxles (FLW 225 9EFI DME602 PMS / FLW 225 36DME LW PMS)

Marsoni

M251S

$314.00

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

NEW STOCK! 60-2 Tooth 9 Bolt 225mm EFI DME Conversion Sport Flywheel For 915 / 901 / 911 Transaxles (FLW 225 9EFI DME602 PMS / FLW 225 36DME LW PMS)IN STOCK READY TO SHIP! Our Lightweight Sport Flywheel Replaces The Heavier Original Equipment (O. E.) Dual Mass Flywheel. This is Perfect For A Porsche 964 993 3. 6L DME Engine Conversion or a 911 3. 0L 3. 2L EFI Conversion To 915 901** Transmissions. This Sport Flywheel Is Great For Upgraded Performance Engines That Need A Flywheel Timing Reference For Engine Management Systems Like Motec Or Aftermarket EFI Conversions Etc. 1978 1998 Porsche 911 964

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your NEW STOCK! 60-2 Tooth 9 Bolt 225mm EFI DME Conversion Sport Flywheel For 915 / 901 / 911 Transaxles (FLW 225 9EFI DME602 PMS / FLW 225 36DME LW PMS) orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your NEW STOCK! 60-2 Tooth 9 Bolt 225mm EFI DME Conversion Sport Flywheel For 915 / 901 / 911 Transaxles (FLW 225 9EFI DME602 PMS / FLW 225 36DME LW PMS) ships.

Need Help?
Questions about NEW STOCK! 60-2 Tooth 9 Bolt 225mm EFI DME Conversion Sport Flywheel For 915 / 901 / 911 Transaxles (FLW 225 9EFI DME602 PMS / FLW 225 36DME LW PMS), sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for NEW STOCK! 60-2 Tooth 9 Bolt 225mm EFI DME Conversion Sport Flywheel For 915 / 901 / 911 Transaxles (FLW 225 9EFI DME602 PMS / FLW 225 36DME LW PMS) in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

The wiring isn’t long enough. That’s the first thing. And the directions are worthless. If my husband wasn’t so good with his hands and didn’t do wiring for a living I would have never been able to figure it out. There’s nothing in the directions about which bolts go where, you have to just figure it out.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on April 5, 2026

Verified Purchase

CharlieOakes

Belleville, US

★★★★★ 5

Very good audio receiver for my tower speakers and record player set up

Style: Stereo Receiver, Configuration: Receiver

I have had my 1980s Roger sound lab CG 82 Tower speakers connected to a 1999 Technics audio receiver. I use this set up for Radio and my record player. After many good years, the low end on my audio receiver gave out. I have had it serviced before, but I have owned it for five years and it is a 27-year-old piece of gear that has seen better days. ChatGPT led me to this receiver. It took me less than five minutes to connect my speakers. What I love about this receiver is that it’s so simple to use. The radio signal is very good right out the box without an additional antenna. I was resistant to buying a Bluetooth receiver, but it connected to my iPad and my iPhone in seconds. Now I can play backing tracks through my Roger sound lab speaker speakers while I jam out on guitar. No issues with sound quality or anything like that. Runs cool and quiet. If you are a total audio file, you could buy something more expensive. I am a musician and I listen to vinyl. Mostly jazz and classical, and this is fine for my needs. For most people running a record player, looking to modernize with a Bluetooth enabled receiver, this will suit your needs.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on April 15, 2026